Have you heard about this new app called BoopSnoop?
It launched in the first week of 2020, and almost immediately, it was downloaded by four people in three different time zones. In the months since, it has remained steady at four
daily active users, with zero churn: a resounding success, exceeding every one of its creator’s expectations.
:)
I made a messaging app for, and with, my family. It is ruthlessly simple; we love it; no one else will ever use it. I wanted to jot down some notes about how and why I made it, both
to (a) offer a nudge to anyone else out there considering a similar project and (b) suggest something a little larger about software.
…
Robin Sloan (yes, this one) talks about an app that he wrote exclusively for his family. He likens the experience to a making a
home-cooked meal. And I totally get it.
I do this kind of thing all the time. Our new home NAS device, Fox, performs a handful
of functions (and I plan to expand it to many more) based on a mixture of open-source and homegrown code, just for my immediate family. Our “family wiki” does the same thing.
And the spreadsheet we use for our finances. I’ve written apps for small groups of friends before, too (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8…). And that’s not to mention the countless “meals for one” I’ve cooked: small applications
written entirely for my own benefit – I’m using one right now to pull this article from the list of “things I’ve read and enjoyed recently” into my blog.
A home-cooked meal benefits from being tailored to its audience (if the recipe calls for mustard, I might use less or omit it because it makes my nose feel funny). It benefits from
being tailored to its purpose. And it benefits from the love that goes into it. My only superstition – that I’m aware of – is that I believe that food tastes better if the chef smiled
during its production… I’m beginning to think that the same might be true for software, too.
First among the reasons I think that learning the basics of programming should be in the school curriculum is that it teaches people how
computers work and so, by proxy, what they are (and are not) capable of. The most digitally-literate non-programmers I know are people who have the
strongest understanding about how and why computers do what they do. But a close second among my reasons is that those with an inclination can go a step further and, without even
necessarily pushing their skills to a level at which they could or would want to work as software developers, build their own tools to “scratch their own itches”. Solving a problem for yourself is enormously empowering, and the versatility of software lends itself to
solving a huge array of relatively-tiny problems: problems that affect individuals, families, or small communities but that aren’t big enough to warrant commercial attention.
(Sometimes these projects explode into something bigger, but usually they remain just as they are: a tool for the benefit of oneself and
one’s immediate tribe. And that’s just great.)