Democracy At Work

Earlier this week, I had a strange experience, but it requires a little bit of back story.

Spend enough time with me, and you’ll hear me gripe about the problems of our democracy: the faults of the plurality voting system, gerrymandering and it’s long-term ripple effects, party politics, the motivations of politicians, and much more, even before I get down to talking about the apathy of constituents and our disgustingly ill-informed populace. I know how little my vote counts for (clue: pretty much nothing), and that’s why to make my opinions heard though occasional, carefully-researched letters to the people who represent me, and I encourage others to do the same – a letter, while in itself not particularly powerful, is still worth a lot more than a ballot paper. And thanks to WriteToThem, it’s really easy to send correspondence to the elected officials who represent you on the local, regional, national and international stages.

Perhaps inspired by some combination of (a) my recent experience with Pecky and the Squawkies, (b)  the mess created by their seagull buddies on and around rubbish collection days – which seems to have gotten worse recently (see photo, above) – and (c) the petitions that seem to be floating about town in general over the last few weeks, requesting that something (humane) is done about the troublesome Aber seagull population, I wrote to the council to express my thoughts on the matter, and to make a few suggestions based on things that have been tried by other towns affected by seagulls.

When I’ve written to representatives before, I’ve gotten a mixed response rate, and that’s fair enough – they’re busy people (at least, they are if they’re doing their job right). Writing to my MP, over the last decade or so, has typically gotten me a response rate of about 80%, which is quite impressive. Writing to MEPs gets a response rate of about 65%. Writing to a PM gets a response rate of about 50%, and that’s better than I’d have expected. So far, writing to my local council, although I’ve not done so often, has gotten me a 100% response rate.

And so I got an e-mail in response to my query about seagulls: great, it’s a pressing issue, apparently, and one that’s attracting a lot of attention from constituents (nice to know I’m not alone in my opinions), and it’s now scheduled for discussion on the next Department of Environmental Services and Housing Scrutiny Committee meeting, which is nice. What I didn’t expect was what followed.

The chap pictured above (thanks, BBC) is Ceredig Davies, Aberystwyth Central Ward councilor for Ceredigion Council. On Monday night, while I was on my way back to The Cottage after ReAnime Night (with a brief diversion to say goodnight to Claire on the way), he pulled up his car alongside me and leapt out, shaking my hand as he went.

He thanked me for my e-mail, explained that he’d e-mailed me and asked if I’d got it, and told me what he’d done about it so far and the challenges were that he thought might make it difficult to implement my suggestions (mostly only things I was aware of, but sadly not things I know the answers to). Then he dashed back across the street, hopped back into his car, and drove away.

This is perhaps the most pro-active response I’ve ever had from an elected official (even without the surprise meeting in the street, his reply to my e-mail was prompt and informative, and was followed-up by more information that interested me), but it left a question burning in my mind: Mr. Davies represents 15,000 or more people in this area, of which I’m just one – how the hell did he know what I looked like, let alone well-enough to spot me in the street. From his car? From behind? At night?

I’m impressed and all that, but it’s still a little spooky. I asked him at the time how he recognised me, and he mumbled something about being the kind of councilor who’s “a bit of an anorak” (what does that mean? does he sit up at night researching his constituents and memorising their appearances and daily movements? does he have a little book with all of our national insurance numbers in and cross them out when he meets us, like a trainspotter but with people?) as he made his way back to his car.

So, the verdict on Mr. Davies: very effective, but also a little bit scary.

6 comments

  1. Statto Statto says:

    Did you read my enormous article about the pointlessness of voting and dangers of democracy?

    If so, you missed a glorious link opportunity. Obviously I’ve now rectified your omission. ;) If not, you might like it.

  2. Dan Q Dan Q says:

    @Statto:

    Yes, I did. Incidentally, I agree with much of what you say, but not all. I disagree, for example, about the comparative value of the average voter’s time, because you make the erroneous assumption that if they weren’t voting, they’d be working. In fact, in a society where fewer and fewer people get any real exercise, the walk down to the polling station might actually do them some personal good, even without looking at the fact that voting makes some people feel good in the same way that playing the lottery does, even though they know that playing won’t make a difference to who wins (it won’t be them!) either.

    I’ve almost never cast a vote in favour of a particular candidate: I usually cast a blank ballot, for some of the reasons you mention in your article, and some others besides. But that’s another story.

  3. Statto Statto says:

    …you make the erroneous assumption that if they weren’t voting, they’d be working.

    Er, no I don’t. Even time not spent working has a value, because, like money or anything else it’s a ‘scarce’ and thus price-able resource. Time = money and all that. Working out how much exactly it’s worth is tricky, though.

    That said, the arguments by appeal to rational fulfilment of irrational desires (ie feeling good about voting, even though it’s pointless) are good ones, and I was a little surprised no-one made them! Might make it rational to vote, but doesn’t make democracy any more functional, though, if the only reason to vote is to satisfy some irrational part of one’s brain…

  4. The Pacifist The Pacifist says:

    Probably because if you search for your name and ‘Aberystwyth’ on Google, most of the first page of results are you. And the first one even has a picture.

  5. Rory Rory says:

    Yeah as Paul said he probably Googled you or had otherwise come upon your blog. You’re not exactly the least conspicuous person around town ;) Also another reason to vote Lib Dem, I’ve always found them very proactive in following up on emails and the like.

  6. Andy Andy says:

    Hi Dan,
    Could it be that if, like me, he receives an email that starts with ‘avapoet@*****.com; on behalf of; Dan Q [dan@s*******ia.org]’ the first thing he does is look at http://www.scatmania.org?

Reply here

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Reply on your own site

Reply by email

I'd love to hear what you think. Send an email to b1567@danq.me; be sure to let me know if you're happy for your comment to appear on the Web!