Thanks to everybody who played Dan’s Dingbats Challenge III; it was great to see some of your answers. Almost everybody did really well on points this time around, but many were let down by their times.
Here’s the final scoreboard and answers:
|Position||Player||Time Taken||Right Answers||Total Time|
Very quick; every one right…
|3mins, 44secs||14||3mins, 44secs|
|2||Count Gonzo van der Winklestein Jones||2mins, 45secs||12||4mins, 25secs|
The fastest time to answer all the questions, but lost marks for wrong answers.
|2mins, 28secs||10.5||5mins, 23secs|
|4||Claire||4mins, 5secs||12||5mins, 45secs|
|5||A Bowl Of Candy||3mins, 23secs||11||5mins, 53secs|
|6||Mister JTA||4mins, 14secs||12||5mins, 54secs|
|7||RockMonkey||5mins, 13secs||13||6mins, 3secs|
|8||Statto||4mins, 10secs||11.5||6mins, 15secs|
|9||Ruth||4mins, 43secs||12||6mins, 23secs|
|10||Pacifist||4mins, 11secs||11||6mins, 41secs|
|11||Matt In The Hat||5mins, 19secs||10||8mins, 39secs|
|12||Leu||5mins, 58secs||10.5||8mins, 53secs|
|13||Raz||6mins, 15secs||10.5||9mins, 10secs|
|14||Itsme (Gaz @ SmartData)||8mins, 23secs||12||10mins, 3secs|
|15||Chloe||7mins, 31secs||9||11mins, 41 secs|
Only answered one question; as a result, came last!
|1mins, 18secs||1||12mins, 8secs|
Apologies to “bleh” from 220.127.116.11; your answers arrived just too late to participate, but for your reference, you took 5mins, 14secs and got 13 right (give or take some interesting phrasing), for a total score of 6mins, 4secs.
Here are the answers. Click on a dingbat for a full-size version:
Charity begins at home
A nice simple one to begine with – the word “charity”, beginning inside a symbolic “home”. I also accepted “in the home”, “starts”, and any other derivitive of this basic phrase.
Yes, I know that this was ludicrously difficult, but a good number of people managed to get it. Incorrect answers included “distillation quarter”, “a quart of alcohol”, “Hooray! Distillation = Whisky!” (thanks, JTA), and “I have no idea”.
Back to basics
Another simple one: at least I thought so – the word “basic”, twice (“two basics”), written backwards (hence “back two/to basics”). Nonetheless, wrong answers included “basic backeards [sic] twice” and “two basic backwards”.
Every dog has it’s day
Several “dogs”, each with a “day”. What more do you want? I accepted “a dog will have it’s day” (basically the same thing), and gave half-marks for “give a dog it’s day” (there’s no “giving” involved, I’m afraid). I also accepted Paul’s “I was going to say “Dog Day Afternoon” but I don’t think so. Every Dog Has His Day?” because he concluded the right answer in the end and he was very sweet to lose several seconds of his time writing me an essay about how he reached that decision.
Definately wrong answers included “dog days”, “dog day afternoon” (what?), “until dog days end” (huh?), “ground-dog day” (umm?), and JTA’s deluded “Hm. Something about the ‘Dog days’ at the arse end of August, I suspect. Er. Which means Sirius, but I can’t get it…”
Like father, like son
The word “like” appears in the place of “father” and his son in this stylised family tree, and most players understood the connection. Wrong answers included the wonderful “your mum” and the great guess “I don’t like my mother (well? It’s true!)”
Look on the bright side
The word “look” appears on the bright (or light) side of this gradient. Most folks seemed to understand, but some guessed “look lighter on the other side” or even “the right look” (what???).
Love is blind
The word “love” is depicted here with a guide dog and cane. “Blind love” was also an acceptable answer. Half-marks were earned for “Love is like the blind leading the blind”, but I’m afraid I can’t give any points for “guide dog of love” (wasn’t that a song by Dire Straits)?
All that glitters is not gold
Decpicted are a bunch of metals, all of which are glittering, except for gold, which is not: hence, “all that glitters is not gold”. It’s not quite what I was looking for, but full marks go for “not everything that glitters is gold”, which still embodies the meaning of the phrase. However, no points for “black gold” or for “Something about gold being stronger or bolder or something than something. (thanks Chloe)”
Divide and rule
It’s a divide symbol, a plus (“and”) symbol, and a rule(r). “Rule and divide”, despite turing the phrase on it’s head, was also acceptable. “Divide and measure” got half a mark, because it was clear that the player who wrote it knew where they were coming from but just hadn’t heard of the phrase before. However, Paul’s “Divide Plus Ruler? What?” doesn’t score on this question.
(It) takes two to tango
Probably ought to explain this one: the word “take” is repeated multiple times (“takes”); followed by the number 2 (“two”), followed by the word “tango” twice (“two/to tango”). Anything close got the mark, but “three takes to tango” is wrong and “right to tango oh fuck it” is way out.
All is fair in love and war
Easy enough – the word “fair” is repeated throughout the words “love” and “war”. The only person to get this wrong wrote “nothing is fain in love and war”, which I don’t think is even close to accurate.
Well there you have it. Keep an eye out for Dan’s Dingbats Challenge IV!