This checkin to GCANV45 #09 Longworth Loop reflects a geocaching.com log entry. See more of Dan's cache logs.
Great container in an excellent spot (have another FP!) but retrieval of this one was a bit of a stretch for my old bones! Amazing route you’ve picked out here, too, CO. TFTC!
This checkin to GCANV41 #08 Longworth Loop reflects a geocaching.com log entry. See more of Dan's cache logs.
QEF at the one obvious hiding place within the GZ. Got pickled retrieving the cache, but that was nothing compared to how difficult it was to extract the log from its inner container. What a challenge! TFTC.
This checkin to GCANV3H #07 Longworth Loop reflects a geocaching.com log entry. See more of Dan's cache logs.
A telltale sign to geocacher’s eye made both finding and retrieving this cache pretty easy. TFTC!
This checkin to GCANV3D #06 Longworth Loop reflects a geocaching.com log entry. See more of Dan's cache logs.
My geosense tingled and I found this cache straightaway, even while the geohound excitedly ran out into the open field ahead and exhorted me to follow. SL, TFTC!
This checkin to GCANV37 #05 Longworth Loop reflects a geocaching.com log entry. See more of Dan's cache logs.
After initially following what I mistook for a geotrail but which turned out to be on entirely the wrong side of the path, I soon saw my mistake, crossed over, and had the cache in hand. TFTC.
This checkin to GCANV2R #03 Longworth Loop reflects a geocaching.com log entry. See more of Dan's cache logs.
Searched high and low around the obvious hiding place before sitting down to have a think and immediately spotting another even better hiding place she the cache in pain sight: d’oh! The geopup didn’t want to come all the all the way to it so she waited at the first obvious hiding spot.
Great to see a good sized cache for the environment and in such good condition. FP awarded. Took 4×4 travel bug. TFTC!
This checkin to GCANV2M #02 Longworth Loop reflects a geocaching.com log entry. See more of Dan's cache logs.
Briefly overshot this one and then failed to get a good GPS fix, but the hint set us right. Gorgeous sun this morning on the poppies peeking up over the corn.
This checkin to GCANV0A #01 Longworth Loop reflects a geocaching.com log entry. See more of Dan's cache logs.
A morning walk for the geohound and I kicked off at this cache, near which we’d parked the car. Long been meaning to explore this loop: let’s see how far we get before the pooch’s tiny legs give her cause to protest! SL as DQ to save space at this QEF. TFTC!
I was updating my CV earlier this week in anticipation of applying for a handful of interesting-looking roles1 and I was considering quite how many different tech stacks I claim significant experience in, nowadays.
There are languages I’ve been writing in every single week for the last 15+ years, of course, like PHP, Ruby, and JavaScript. And my underlying fundamentals are solid.
But is it really fair for me to be able to claim that I can code in Java, Go, or Python: languages that I’ve not used commercially within the last 5-10 years?
Obviously, I couldn’t just let that question lie2. Let’s find out!
I fished around on Glassdoor for a bit to find a medium-sized single-sitting tech test, and found a couple of different briefs that I mashed together to create this:
In an object-oriented manner, implement an LRU (Least-Recently Used) cache:
- The size of the cache is specified at instantiation.
- Arbitrary objects can be
putinto the cache, along with a retrieval key in the form of a string. Using the same string, you cangetthe objects back.- If a
putoperation would increase the number of objects in the cache beyond the size limit, the cached object that was least-recently accessed (by either aputorgetoperation) is removed to make room for it.putting a duplicate key into the cache should update the associated object (and make this item most-recently accessed).- Both the
getandputoperations should resolve within constant (O(1)) time.- Add automated tests to support the functionality.
My plan was to implement a solution to this challenge, in as many of the languages mentioned on my CV as possible in a single sitting.
But first, a little Data Structures & Algorithms theory:
The simplest way to implement such a cache might be as follows:
get, iterate through the list to try to find the matching item.
put, first check if it already exists in the list as with get:
The problem with this approach is that it fails the requirement that the methods “should resolve within constant (O(1)) time”3.
Of particular concern is the fact that any operation which might need to re-sort the list to put the just-accessed item at the top 4. Let’s try another design:
Here’s another way to implement the cache:
get, check the hash map to see if the item exists.
put, check the hash map to see if the item exists.
prev of the current head item and then pointing the head to the new item (which will have the old head item as its
next), and
tail at the tail item’s prev, and
unlink the expired tail item from the new tail item’s next.
prev and next to find its siblings and link them to one another (removes the item from the list).
next to the current head, and the current head‘s prev to the promoted item.
head of the list at the promoted item.
It’s important to realise that this alternative implementation isn’t better. It’s just different: the “right” solution depends on the use-case5.
That’s enough analysis and design. Time to write some code.
Picking a handful of the more-useful languages on my CV6, I opted to implement in:
Naturally, I open-sourced everything if you’d like to see for yourself. It all works, although if you’re actually in need of such a cache for your project you’ll probably find an alternative that’s at least as good (and more-likely to be maintained!) in a third-party library somewhere!
This was actually pretty fun! I might continue to expand my repo by doing the same challenge with a few of the other languages I’ve used professionally at some point or another7.
And there’s a few takeaways I got from this experience –
As I went along, one language at a time, I ended up realising improvements that I could make to earlier iterations.
For example, when I came to the TypeScript implementation, I decided to use generics so that the developer can specify what kind of objects they want to store in the cache,
rather than just a generic Object, and better benefit type-safety. That’s when I remembered that Java supports generics, too, so I went back and used them there as well.
In the same way as speaking multiple (human) languages or studying linguistics can help unlock new ways of thinking about your communication, being able to think in terms of multiple different programming languages helps you spot new opportunities. When in 2020 PHP 8 added nullsafe operators, union types, and named arguments, I remember feeling confident using them from day one because those features were already familiar to me from Ruby8, TypeScript9, and Python10, respectively.
I’ve applied for a handful of jobs now, but if one of them had invited me to a pairing session on a language I’m rusty on (like Java!) I might’ve felt intimidated.
But it turns out I shouldn’t need to be! With my solid fundamentals and a handful of other languages under my belt, I understand when I need to step away from the code editor and hit the API documentation. Turns out, I’m in a good position to demo any of my language skills.
I remember when I was first learning Go, I wanted to make use of a particular language feature that I didn’t know whether it had. But because I’d used that feature in Ruby, I knew what to search for in Go’s documentation to see if it was supported (it wasn’t) and if so, what the syntax was11.
Switching between six different languages while writing the same application was occasionally challenging, but not in the ways I expected.
I’ve had plenty of experience switching programming languages mid-train-of-thought before. Sometimes you just have to flit between the frontend and backend of your application!
But this time around I discovered: changes in structure are apparently harder for my brain than changes in syntax. E.g.:
#-comments instead of Go/Java/TypeScript-style //-comments; whoops!
I’m guessing that the part of my memory that looks after a language’s keywords, how a method header is structured, and which equals sign to use for assignment versus comparison… are stored in a different part of my brain than the bit that keeps track of how a language is laid-out?12
I reckon it’s time I got back into work, so I’m going to have a look around and see if there’s any roles out there that look exciting to me.
If you know anybody who’s looking for a UK-based, remote-first, senior+, full-stack web developer with 25+ years experience and more languages than you can shake a stick at… point them at my CV, would you?
1 I suspect that when most software engineers look for a new job, they filter to the languages, frameworks, they feel they’re strongest at. I do a little of that, I suppose, but I’m far more-motivated by culture, sector, product and environment than I am by the shape of your stack, and I’m versatile enough that technology specifics can almost come second. So long as you’re not asking me to write VB.NET.
2 It’s sort-of a parallel to how I decided to check the other week that my Gutenberg experience was sufficiently strong that I could write standard ReactJS, too.
3 I was pleased to find a tech test that actually called for an understanding of algorithm growth/scaling rates, so I could steal this requirement for my own experiment! I fear that sometimes, in their drive to be pragmatic and representative of “real work”, the value of a comprehension of computer science fundamentals is overlooked by recruiters.
4 Even if an algorithm takes the approach of creating a new list with the inserted/modified item at the top, that’s still just a very-specific case of insertion sort when you think about it, right?
5 The second design will be slower at writing but faster at reading, and will scale better as the cache gets larger. That sounds great for a read-often/write-rarely cache, but your situation may differ.
6 Okay, my language selection was pretty arbitrary. But if I’d have also come up with implementations in Perl, and C#, and Elixir, and whatever else… I’d have been writing code all day!
7 So long as I’m willing to be flexible about the “object-oriented” requirement, there are even more options available to me. Probably the language that I last wrote longest ago would be Pascal: I wonder how much of that I remember?
8 Ruby’s safe navigation/”lonely” operator did the same thing as PHP’s nullsafe operator since 2015.
9 TypeScript got union types back in 2015, and apart from them being more-strictly-enforced they’re basically identical to PHP’s.
10 Did you know that Python had keyword arguments since its very first public release way back in 1994! How did it take so many other interpreted languages so long to catch up?
11 The feature was the three-way comparison or “spaceship operator”, in case you were wondering.
12 I wonder if anybody’s ever laid a programmer in an MRI machine while they code? I’d be really interested to see if different bits of the brain light up when coding in functional programming languages than in procedural ones, for example!
This checkin to GC9GTV3 Drive Slowly; Fox Crossing reflects a geocaching.com log entry. See more of Dan's cache logs.
Performed a quick checkup on this much-loved cache before the summertime cachers come out in earnest. All looks healthy here!
This is a repost promoting content originally published elsewhere. See more things Dan's reposted.
…
It’s so emblematic of the moment we’re in, the Who Cares Era, where completely disposable things are shoddily produced for people to mostly ignore.
…
In the Who Cares Era, the most radical thing you can do is care.
In a moment where machines churn out mediocrity, make something yourself. Make it imperfect. Make it rough. Just make it.
At a time where the government’s uncaring boot is pressing down on all of our necks, the best way to fight back is to care. Care loudly. Tell others. Get going.
…
Smart words, well-written by Dan Sinker.
I like the fact that he correctly identifies that the “Who Cares Era” – illustrated by the bulk creation of low-effort, low-quality media, for a disheartened audience that no longer has a reason to give a damn – isn’t about AI.
I mean… AI’s certainly not helping! AI slop dominates social media (especially in right-wing spaces, for retrospectively-obvious reasons) and bleeds out into the mainstream. LLM-generated content, lacking even the slightest human input, is becoming painfully ubiquitous. It’s pretty sad out there.
But AI’s doing some useful things too: it’s not without its value, even just in popular use.
So while the “Who Cares Era” might be exemplified by the proliferation of AI slop… it’s much bigger than that. It’s a sociological change, tied perhaps to a growing dissatisfaction with our governments and the increasing feeling of powerlessness to change the unjust social systems we’re locked into?
I don’t know how to fix it. I don’t even know if it’s fixable. But I agree with Dan’s argument that a great starting point is to care.
And I, for one, am going to continue to create things I care about, giving them the time and attention they deserve. And maybe if enough of us can do that, just that, then maybe that’ll make the difference.
I’m applying for a few roles that might be the next step in my career. And to my surprise, updating my CV and tweaking my portfolio is doing a world of good for my feelings of self-worth!
Seriously: looking back over the last ~25 years of my career and enumerating the highlights is giving me a better “big picture” view of everything I’ve achieved than I ever got from the near-focus of daily work. I should do this more often!
I don’t want to withdraw any of our children from sec [sic] education lessons.
However they’re spelled, they’re a great idea, and I’m grateful to live in a part of the world where their existence isn’t the target of religious politics.
But if I can withdraw consent to receiving emails about sex education in Comic Sans then that’d be great, thanks. 😅
Fellow Abnibbers and I, who see each other extraordinary infrequently in our diaspora, have a tradition of sharing a group selfie when we happen to coincide. I forgot to take one when @garethbowker@infosec.exchange and I met today, and by way of penance I tried to draw what I should have done.
Unfortunately I can’t draw. He looks much less like a potato in real life! Think I got his dog right, though.
This checkin to GC1QR0V Church Micro 605 Almondsbury reflects a geocaching.com log entry. See more of Dan's cache logs.
Stopped at the pub nearby for an incredibly late lunch and to recharge the electric car on my journey from Pembrokeshire to Oxfordshire, because I’d much rather get off the motorway and find somewhere nice to sit while the electrons do their thing. Spotted this nearby cache in the yard of this beautiful church, which made for a lovely walk as the well-tended flowerbeds were wonderfully fragrant. Followed a geotrail to find the cache. Amazing, loved finding this so much. SL, TNLN, TFTC, FP awarded.
