Skip to content

Dan Q

    • Articles
    • Everything
    • Notes
    • Reposts (shares)
    • Checkins (geo*)
    • Videos
    • Reviews
    • Comics
    • Tags
    • Stats
    • Subscribe
    • Blogroll
  • About
    • Semi-standard "slash pages" you might like to explore:
    • /about
    • /blank
    • /blogroll
    • /colophon
    • /contact
    • /cv
    • /events
    • /license
    • /pfp
    • /postcards
    • /privacy
    • /salary
    • /shh
    • /slashes
    • /stats
    • /subscribe
    • /where
    • Hide posts of type:
    • Choose how Dan's dressed:
    • Hair
    • T-Shirt
  • Contact
  • Podcast

Tag: ai

  • Today, an AI review tool used by my workplace reviewed some code that I wrote, and incorrectly claimed that it would introduce a bug because a global variable I created could "be available to multiple browser tabs" (that's not how browser JavaScript works).

    Just in case I was mistaken, I explained to the AI why I thought it was wrong, and asked it to explain itself.

    To do so, the LLM wrote a PR to propose adding some code to use our application's save mechanism to pass the data back, via the server, and to any other browser tab, thereby creating the problem that it claimed existed.

    This isn't even the most-efficient way to create this problem. localStorage would have been better.

    So in other words, today I watched an AI:
    (a) claim to have discovered a problem (that doesn't exist),
    (b) when challenged, attempt to create the problem (that wasn't needed), and
    (c) do so in a way that was suboptimal.

    Humans aren't perfect. A human could easily make one of these mistakes. Under some circumstances, a human might even have made two of these mistakes. But to make all three? That took an AI.

    What's the old saying? "To err is human, but to really foul things up you need a computer."

    • Note
    • 1 comment
    • posted 25 February, 2026
  • claude, make it make sense *harder*

    blackle mori delivers a welll-rounded, one might say voluptuous, take on the writing process, glistening with the fiery passion of its author. I desperately want to get off... how fun this post was.

    Read more (351 words)

    • Repost
    • of this original
    • 1 comment
    • posted 22 February, 2026
  • Cover image for Hello World: How to be Human in the Age of the Machine by Hannah Fry. The title and subtitles are interconnected by green lines in the style of a process flowchart.

    Hello World by Hannah Fry

    It took me a while, but I finally got around to reading Hannah Fry's "Hello World: How to Be Human in the Age of the Machine", and it was really good!

    Read more (334 words)

    • Article
    • posted 21 February, 2026
  • AI and cigarettes

    Chris Ferdinandi draws parallels between people pushing 'less-harmful' AI and those promoting vaping as 'less-harmful' smoking; the latter, of course, ultimately resulted in new people taking up a nicotine habit that might now have otherwise: not what was intended at all!

    Read more (350 words)

    • Repost
    • of this original
    • posted 20 November, 2025
  • Galaxy Quest: Tawny Madison says "Gosh, I'm doing it. I'm repeating the damn computer."

    We Need to Talk About Botsplaining

    In a wonderful blog post from last month, Stephanie describes the scourge of Botsplaining. Here's my experience of it.

    Read more - about 3 minutes (577 words)

    • Repost
    • of this original
    • 3 comments
    • posted 14 November, 2025
  • AI assistants misrepresent news content 45% of the time

    The BBC and EBU did some research and discovered that AI assistants tasked with bringing you news get it right only slightly more-often than they get it wrong, and they get it catastrophically wrong about one time in five. This should be a surprise to nobody.

    Read more (407 words)

    • Repost
    • of this original
    • posted 23 October, 2025
  • Somebody just called me and quickly decided it was a wrong number. The signal was bad and I wasn't sure I'd heard them right, so I followed up by replying by text.

    It turns out they asked Siri to call Three (the mobile network). Siri then presumably searched online, found Three Rings, managed to connect that to my mobile number, and called me.

    If Siri's decided that I represent Three, this could work out even worse than that time Google shared my phone number.

    • Note
    • posted 14 October, 2025
  • A Zimbabwean one hundred trillion dollar bill; the bill's iconography have been replaced with the glaring red eye of HAL 9000 from Stanley Kubrick's '2001: A Space Odyssey' and a stylized, engraving-style portrait of Sam Altman.

    The real (economic) AI apocalypse is nigh

    Cory Doctorow paints a bleak picture of the future world economy in the aftermath of the bursting of the AI bubble. I agree that we're in a bubble, but I'm slightly more-optimistic that we can survive it without a total economic catastrophe.

    Read more (325 words)

    • Repost
    • of this original
    • posted 30 September, 2025
  • Will Smith, seen from behind, holds his hand aloft in front of a large crowd; composite showing how the video appeared both on Instagram and YouTube.

    Will Smith’s concert crowds are real, but AI is blurring the lines

    A recent video by Will Smith gained widespread condemnation for using AI to artificially-inflate his crowd's size. Except that's not what happened at all: a little creative editing by his media team, combined with a secret experiment by YouTube to make some videos look immeasurably more-shit by performing AI upscaling on them, seems to have kicked off this particular round of Internet craziness.

    Read more (427 words)

    • Repost
    • of this original
    • posted 26 August, 2025
  • A two-axis graph labeled 'Beliefs about AI' with the x-axis of 'Transformative' and the y-axis of 'Positive'. The field is divided into four quadrants: 'Skeptical' in the bottom-left, 'Wary' in the bottom-right, 'Pragmatist' in the top-left, and 'Optimist' in the top-right.

    Four perspectives on AI

    Sean McPherson shared a "four quadrants" diagram for people's beliefs about AI, with a specific focus on LLMs used for coding assistance. Here's where I sit on it, and why.

    Read more - about 4 minutes (721 words)

    • Repost
    • of this original
    • posted 21 August, 2025
  • Photograph of three versions of the raptor engine, each one getting progressively simplified in mechanical parts.

    Just a Little More Context Bro, I Promise, and It’ll Fix Everything

    Based on my experience of 'vibe coding', I think Jim Nielsen's analogies are absolutely spot on.

    Read more (423 words)

    • Repost
    • of this original
    • 1 comment
    • posted 18 August, 2025
  • The rise of Whatever

    A freaking excellent longread by Eevee (Evelyn Woods), lamenting the direction of popular technological progress and general enshittification of creator culture. It's ultimately uplifting, I feel, but it's full of bitterness until it gets there.

    Read more (455 words)

    • Repost
    • of this original
    • posted 6 August, 2025
  • ArtificialCast

    ArtificialCast is a lightweight, type-safe casting and transformation utility powered by large language models. It allows seamless conversion between strongly typed objects using only type metadata, JSON schema inference, and prompt-driven reasoning.

    Read more - about 3 minutes (612 words)

    • Repost
    • of this original
    • posted 26 July, 2025
  • Screenshot of ChatGPT telling users to enter this ASCII tab into soundslice.com

    Adding a feature because ChatGPT incorrectly thinks it exists

    ChatGPT lied about the functionality of Adrian Holovaty's software tool, Soundslice. So rather than try to get ChatGPT corrected, he just... implemented the feature it had claimed he already had. Is this the first time in history that this has happened? It could be!

    Read more (213 words)

    • Repost
    • of this original
    • posted 18 July, 2025
  • Fragment of court ruling with a line highlighted that reads: This order grants summary judgment for Anthropic that the training use was a fair use.

    The Huge Grey Area in the Anthropic Ruling

    The court ruling that declares Anthropic's use of (purchased) books as training material leaves a curious sorites paradox. If we assume that an LLM trained on only one book (and so only capable of producing content directly inspired by that book) would necessarily be copyright-infringing, at what number of books does that cease to be the case?

    Read more - about 3 minutes (622 words)

    • Article
    • posted 28 June, 2025

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Get in Touch

I'd love to hear from you! Why not...

  • email me on blog@danq.me?
    (my spam filter is aggressive, so use a good subject line, i.e. not just "hello"; encrypt your email if you like)
  • say hi on Mastodon, where I'm @dan@danq.me?
  • send a letter or postcard to
    Dan Q, Unit 159610, PO Box 7169, Poole, BH15 9EL, UK
  • reach out some other way?
  • Β© Dan Q 1998-2026
  • Creative CommonsAttributionNon-Commercial except where stated (how to use)
  • powered by BloqClassicPressHTML5CSS3
  • privacy
  • Read articles, checkins, notes, reposts, and more...
  • @dan@danq.me
  • contact
  • subscribe
  • Dan Q
  • Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial license
  • ClassicPress
  • CSS is awesome
  • Created by a human, not by AI
  • LGBTQ+ pride flag (2018 progress variant)
  • Polyamory flag
  • Say no to Web3
  • Mastodon (it's like email... no, come back!)
  • Tested on Firefox
  • Best viewed on the Internet
  • PHP
  • Ruby
  • Debian
  • Caddy (webserver)
  • Find me on Melonland
  • Check out my GitHub
  • Three Rings - by volunteers, for volunteers, since 2002
  • I'm a fucking webmaster
  • Looks best at: any resolution!