Ah-hah! Right you are. I’m still correct for the ranges I tested (because the year after and the year before aren’t leap years anyway), but it’s a valid point. I had meant to use:
(0…400)
Ah-hah! Right you are. I’m still correct for the ranges I tested (because the year after and the year before aren’t leap years anyway), but it’s a valid point. I had meant to use:
(0…400)